Talk:Non-android devices: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Created page with "I'm not sure this page needs to exist as the main devices page contains everything on it." |
Revoke n-android |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not sure this page needs to exist as the main devices page contains everything on it. | I'm not sure this page needs to exist as the main devices page contains everything on it. -- [[User:Nobodywasishere|Nobodywasishere]] ([[User talk:Nobodywasishere|talk]]) 23:57, 24 January 2020 | ||
=== Revoke <code>n-android</code> === | |||
I suggest to make an OS category, doing so will be more informative and precise. | |||
* Some devices might have two OSs at the same time, albeit some are branded forks. | |||
* Devices shipped with bada and EMUI may be classified under bada and Android categories) | |||
* Volla[https://wiki.postmarketos.org/index.php?search=Volla|Volla] is shipped with Android or Linux, so <code>n-android</code> is both compatible and incompatible at the same time for Volla, hence, both, the absense and presence of, <code>n-android</code> for Volla is missleading. | |||
P.S. Marketing the opposite | |||
It is Real Linux we want to market, not otherwise. | |||
By having <code>n-android</code> tag we, in fact, marketing Android, but I don't think we should. | |||
Assumming we have 1M devices NOT running Android and 1K devices running Android. then we market Android 1M times where it is not even a matter to consider. | |||
* Is the company behind Android pays pmOS to do so? | |||
* No. | |||
* Is it a sponsor of pmOS in any way? | |||
* No. | |||
Then why do we provide it marketing for FREE? | |||
Why are we marketing a brand which goes against our interest? | |||
-- [[User:SoySoy|SoySoy]] ([[User talk:SoySoy|talk]]) 07:00, 25 Dec 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:02, 25 December 2022
I'm not sure this page needs to exist as the main devices page contains everything on it. -- Nobodywasishere (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2020
Revoke n-android
I suggest to make an OS category, doing so will be more informative and precise.
- Some devices might have two OSs at the same time, albeit some are branded forks.
- Devices shipped with bada and EMUI may be classified under bada and Android categories)
- Volla[1] is shipped with Android or Linux, so
n-android
is both compatible and incompatible at the same time for Volla, hence, both, the absense and presence of,n-android
for Volla is missleading.
P.S. Marketing the opposite
It is Real Linux we want to market, not otherwise.
By having n-android
tag we, in fact, marketing Android, but I don't think we should.
Assumming we have 1M devices NOT running Android and 1K devices running Android. then we market Android 1M times where it is not even a matter to consider.
- Is the company behind Android pays pmOS to do so?
- No.
- Is it a sponsor of pmOS in any way?
- No.
Then why do we provide it marketing for FREE?
Why are we marketing a brand which goes against our interest?